(March 22, 2012 at 12:49 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: The discussion was over a long time ago. You have your answer. We're discussing evidence now because it's really the only thing left to talk about. We don't find your ad hoc explanations for the reconcilation of Genesis with science to be interesting because creationists of any faith can do the exact same thing. To us it's like you're talking about who would win between Thor and the Hulk.
Well I'm glad to see the thread has been put to better use since the last time I looked in. I've put this guy on ignore. It really isn't hard to do. As to the question of Hulk vs Thor, if weapons are not allowed then clearly you have to go with the Hulk. Even if Thor gets his hammer I might have to go with big green.
(March 22, 2012 at 12:49 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: You seem to be under the impression that we don't believe in God because of the evidence for evolution rather than the lack of evidence for God. From page one, people have been telling you that evolution doesn't disprove God. Is there a particular reason why you can't absorb that we don't regard evolution as a disproof of God? Evolution only provide evidence against a God defined as creating life pretty much as it is now. We're quite aware that's not the only way God is defined.
Thank you. I'll never know if whathisface gets what you are saying but I am well past caring.
