(March 23, 2012 at 6:38 pm)Drich Wrote: Your participation in this line of thought presupposes that it does. If you are willing to concede the idea God created Adam and Eve apart from the rest of the planet, and suppose that their genetic markers would some how magically be any different than Monkey Man. Then by all accounts you have accepted the genesis record of creation at least for the sake of this argument. Of which the story of Noah is apart. thus creating the historical bottle neck that eliminates Monkey man.
Wait wtf are you talking about?
No adam and eve didn't exist. I have no idea where you come up with bullshit from. 'Monkey man' has been proven to exist. There is a evolutionary fossil record for humans to our ape like ancestors and beyond. So in the logic you just used it blows the bottle up and makes the bible redundant oh dear.