RE: Freewill
March 26, 2012 at 4:34 am
(This post was last modified: March 26, 2012 at 4:39 am by FallentoReason.)
Taking into account that everyone is born without any knowledge this implies that an individual can essentially lean towards any religion given the relative exposure. If an individual remains unexposed to religion they will percieve the world from a 'neutral' perspective (that is to say not leaning towards any particular religion).
I will have to go with Occam's Razor here and say the neutral perspective must be the most accurate.
This would be consistent with the fact that reality seems to be described in an ambiguous manner by the Bible and science. We can deduce that the more 'complex' explanation is the one trying to rest its explanation of the universe on the shoulders of a non-existent messiah.
I will have to go with Occam's Razor here and say the neutral perspective must be the most accurate.
This would be consistent with the fact that reality seems to be described in an ambiguous manner by the Bible and science. We can deduce that the more 'complex' explanation is the one trying to rest its explanation of the universe on the shoulders of a non-existent messiah.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
