(March 26, 2012 at 1:00 pm)Mosrhun Wrote: No, because no game requires what the 680 is pumping out right now. the 580 is like 1.5 years old and will be a powerhouse for years.Yes, but do you deny that the 680 will last far longer than the 580? The whole point of releasing new GPUs is so that games can add more and more stuff, knowing that computers will be able to handle it.
Quote:I'll go back to my point with CGi in movies. When you go to movie, it's to be immersed in the story/environment and this requires a level of realism. The same is applied to games.In my opinion, more realism comes from the plot than anything else. To illustrate, the only awards the Transformers films were nominated for were graphics and sound based. I don't know about anyone else, but I got really immersed into the video game "VVVVVV", which has a fun and simple plot, with an absolutely phenomenal gameplay. It also looks like this:
![[Image: wRdsd.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FwRdsd.jpg)
Quote:I'm sorry but 2x AA is worthless, might as well not even have it. 16X AA blows that shit out of the water.I developed some Xbox games. It isn't worthless; in fact when applied correctly it makes a whole load of difference. Quit pretending to know what you are talking about; your first statement was complete bullshit, and now you are simply trying to dodge around the fact that you were wrong.
Quote:I said laziness or lack of give a fuck. Simmer down.So now "lack of money" means "lack of giving a fuck"? Are you by any chance a Republican?
Hey look Min, reverendjeremiah, bozo, etc...I made a funny!
Quote:You can still write a letter by hand and mail it. Doesn't make it more efficient then sending a god damn email.
I never argued Xbox gaming was more efficient. It certainly is cheaper though, and for people who don't care much about graphics (i.e. me) that makes all the difference.