RE: God formally disproven
March 27, 2012 at 2:28 am
(This post was last modified: March 27, 2012 at 2:31 am by FallentoReason.)
fr0d0 Wrote:Your logic is badly flawed. You promote slavery, and non sentient beings over what we have?Huh? Show me where I promoted such things.
Quote:God couldn't be viable in his benevolence if he had nothing to be benevolent about. If anything your proposal proves God.God with all his benevolence should have made the perfect world for us, instead of this mediocre world where 'good' would be an incredible overstatement if you were to describe the state of our existence. Children dying of starvation every x seconds isn't what I consider 'the best world possible'.
This doesn't even come close to proving God's existence because if you admit he is omnibenevolent then ask yourself, why does suffering exist? It is impossible for God to want to create anything less than what his ominbenevolent desires make him create. Otherwise you have no choice but to admit he isn't ominbenevolent.
Quote:Which is why the notion of him survives: because it is a rationally coherent answer.Ah you're right... well then.. I have no choice but to praise Allah.
The only reason the notion of him survives is because believers cling on to the only proof they have which is their holy books. I'm not really interested in discussing why your god is the right one over the others on this thread.
Quote:People hurt themselves. God allows that as part of the sentient model that he created.So that's his ominbenevolence in action? Allow his creations to make themselves suffer? This shows his lack of knowledge on how to create perfect beings or he simply isn't omnibenevolent as to create the best world for us.
Quote:Yes, assumptions about God can be tested and observed. Objection is essential and acceptance demanded with no credible alternative offered.Show me the physical evidence I can observe please.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
