God formally disproven

[Neo-Scholastic]

I agree. I also don't think it's our position to have to disprove anything. The person who makes the positive claim must provide the evidence and argumentation.

Try reading the title of the thread "God Formally Disproved." A claim is being made and that claim is to have disproved the existence of god.The case can be made of internal inconsistency. But that is not the claim being made. It very clearly states that it disproves god's existence.

It is incumbent upon the one presenting this claim to define and defend the terms of each premise.The terms for good and evil are used in the argument. Yet no one is willing to step up and state the foundation of their morality that allows them to judge the actions of god.