Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 19, 2025, 3:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Darwinism
#59
RE: Darwinism
(May 19, 2009 at 11:05 pm)icthus Wrote: Hello again Chatpilot, (and the rest of y'all) As stated in the bible thread I would love to defend my Bible and I would like to hear your defenses for Darwinism.

Here is my question-- In the earth's crust are many layers of strata,the lowest level of strata that scientists have found with fossil remains is the Cambrian Strata. The fossil remains in this strata compare to todays animals. If evolution is genuine-where are their ancestors???-

Here is Charles Darwins answer to my question-- [to the question why we do not find rich fossilferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian System I can give no satisfactory answer..the case at present must remain inexplicable;and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained] Origin of the Species Pg.39

Since Charles Darwin cannot defend Darwinism and evolution I'd like to hear what you have to say about it. Icthus

Those are their ancestors. That is why they are similar. NO animals are found in Cambrian strata that compare enough to the animals today to even suggest evolution didn't happen. They are similar because they are ancestors...they are not extremely alike. Darwin started the ball rolling on evolution. He was one of the first scientists to suggest that animals could have Evolved publicly. He was not 100% accurate on all of his research. He just opened the door for other scientists to take what he discovered and actually work with it to find out what we know today. Science is a changing field of study because our technology changes so rapidly and you can't expect a scientist from the 1800's to be accurate according to research today.

Science is not the Bible. We don't just write one book and make it law. We write what we know today...and maybe we can change it tomorrow if we learn something new. We aren't about trying to tell a story and stick with it no matter how retarded it sounds 100 years later.

Does evolution happen? YES. Is Charles Darwin important to science today? YES. He was wonderful and brilliant and yes I display a Darwin fish on my car. He is one of my favorite scientists because he made such a contribution to Geology.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Darwinism - by icthus - May 19, 2009 at 11:05 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Madscientist - May 20, 2009 at 1:26 am
RE: Darwinism - by leo-rcc - May 20, 2009 at 4:37 am
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - May 20, 2009 at 5:06 am
RE: Darwinism - by lrh9 - May 20, 2009 at 6:05 am
RE: Darwinism - by Tiberius - May 20, 2009 at 7:29 am
RE: Darwinism - by icthus - May 20, 2009 at 8:14 pm
RE: Darwinism - by leo-rcc - May 20, 2009 at 8:24 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - May 21, 2009 at 4:07 pm
RE: Darwinism - by fr0d0 - May 21, 2009 at 7:48 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Tiberius - May 20, 2009 at 8:39 pm
RE: Darwinism - by icthus - May 20, 2009 at 9:16 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Giff - May 26, 2009 at 8:13 am
RE: Darwinism - by Darwinian - May 30, 2009 at 2:02 pm
RE: Darwinism - by leo-rcc - May 30, 2009 at 3:30 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Edwardo Piet - May 30, 2009 at 3:31 pm
RE: Darwinism - by leo-rcc - May 30, 2009 at 3:46 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Edwardo Piet - May 30, 2009 at 4:32 pm
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - June 18, 2009 at 12:01 pm
RE: Darwinism - by LukeMC - June 18, 2009 at 3:10 pm
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - June 23, 2009 at 9:01 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - June 18, 2009 at 3:23 pm
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - June 24, 2009 at 3:06 pm
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - July 6, 2009 at 5:12 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - July 7, 2009 at 2:19 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Samson - June 18, 2009 at 8:08 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Tiberius - June 24, 2009 at 9:56 am
RE: Darwinism - by Darwinian - June 24, 2009 at 11:16 am
RE: Darwinism - by Tiberius - June 24, 2009 at 11:44 am
RE: Darwinism - by Tiberius - June 24, 2009 at 4:33 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - June 24, 2009 at 4:38 pm
RE: Darwinism - by padraic - June 25, 2009 at 4:31 am
RE: Darwinism - by Samson - June 25, 2009 at 3:05 pm
RE: Darwinism - by LonePiper - July 1, 2009 at 2:05 am
RE: Darwinism - by Tiberius - July 7, 2009 at 11:20 am
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - July 8, 2009 at 11:14 am
RE: Darwinism - by Purple Rabbit - July 7, 2009 at 2:36 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - July 7, 2009 at 3:05 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Purple Rabbit - July 7, 2009 at 3:08 pm
RE: Darwinism - by LonePiper - July 13, 2009 at 1:03 pm
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - July 24, 2009 at 11:50 am
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - July 15, 2009 at 11:53 am
RE: Darwinism - by lilphil1989 - July 15, 2009 at 12:25 pm
RE: Darwinism - by LonePiper - July 16, 2009 at 3:40 pm
RE: Darwinism - by SenseiOtho - July 24, 2009 at 10:44 am
RE: Darwinism - by LonePiper - August 4, 2009 at 2:34 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - August 4, 2009 at 4:27 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Anto Kennedy - August 5, 2009 at 3:18 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - August 6, 2009 at 4:38 am
RE: Darwinism - by Anto Kennedy - August 6, 2009 at 9:15 am
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - August 6, 2009 at 9:40 am
RE: Darwinism - by Anto Kennedy - August 6, 2009 at 1:19 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Kyuuketsuki - August 6, 2009 at 4:30 pm
RE: Darwinism - by Anto Kennedy - August 6, 2009 at 6:24 pm
RE: Darwinism - by theVOID - August 13, 2009 at 12:51 am
RE: Darwinism - by Anto Kennedy - August 16, 2009 at 12:44 pm
RE: Darwinism - by dry land fish - August 16, 2009 at 9:48 pm
RE: Darwinism - by fr0d0 - August 17, 2009 at 4:19 am



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)