(April 4, 2012 at 4:49 pm)AthiestAtheist Wrote: 1. It's my site
2. It was a joke
3. He/she was being disruptive (while simultaneously being disruptive).
1. Please point out where I have used that argument.
2. It was a joke. A prank for April Fools Day. If you don't have a sense of humour, that is your problem, not mine.
3. This entire bloody mess was disruptive, but as you can see, we have only so far banned one person over it, and that was a person who wasn't involved in the first place, but rather decided to start flame baiting and trying to cause more chaos.