(April 4, 2012 at 5:02 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(April 4, 2012 at 4:49 pm)AthiestAtheist Wrote: 1. It's my site
2. It was a joke
3. He/she was being disruptive (while simultaneously being disruptive).
1. Please point out where I have used that argument.
2. It was a joke. A prank for April Fools Day. If you don't have a sense of humour, that is your problem, not mine.
3. This entire bloody mess was disruptive, but as you can see, we have only so far banned one person over it, and that was a person who wasn't involved in the first place, but rather decided to start flame baiting and trying to cause more chaos.
I wasn't just talking about April Fool's Day. I was talking about how it just highlighted a bigger issue. Also it being an April Fool's Day is not an excuse when it went on for 3 weeks. I was talking about how it's basically OK for mods to break the rules and insult people, then just claim it was a joke. A joke is not non-malicious when the target of the joke is not OK with it.
"Sisters, you know only the north; I have traveled in the south lands. There are churches there, believe me, that cut their children too, as the people of Bolvangar did--not in the same way, but just as horribly. They cut their sexual organs, yes, both boys and girls; they cut them with knives so that they shan't feel. That is what the Church does, and every church is the same: control, destroy, obliterate every good feeling. So if a war comes, and the Church is on one side of it, we must be on the other, no matter what strange allies we find ourselves bound to."
-Ruta Skadi, The Subtle Knife
-Ruta Skadi, The Subtle Knife
