new member

[Minimalist]

Whether an archeologicalist have found evidence or not YET does not mean they wont in the future.

That is the single silliest thing you have said yet.


What about situations where archaeologists have dug in Jerusalem and found evidence for a miserable little shithole of a village in the 10th century? No great and glorious capital of a far-flung empire. A one-horse town of perhaps 500-1,000 people clinging to a poverty-ridden existence in a region with a total population of perhaps 20,000 (mainly) pastoralists following their sheep and goats around and kicking the shit off their feet.

There is NO absence of evidence about Jerusalem. The evidence is that your fucking bible is a fairy tale...much like the Arthurian legends which added 11th century castles and chivalry onto, at best, a 5th century tale of barbarians overrunning an abandoned portion of the Roman empire.