(April 19, 2012 at 9:43 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Well, unnecessary suffering would leave the door open to necessary suffering. If we were presented with multiple possible solutions, wouldn't we have to opt in on the one that causes the least amount of necessary suffering? That would seem to be consistent with our stated justifications in adopting this principle.
So suffering can't be avoided.. And I think that is a wet dream about as likely to happen as trying to prevent teens from being sexually active. Just ask the Christians how well that works out. :/
