(April 21, 2012 at 11:47 am)Abishalom Wrote:You have an inability to grasp the context. Firstly that wiki page is speaking specifically about SNPs that are defined as having an occurrence of at least 1% in the entire human population. That is a high frequency SNP and they are useful for medical research and yes, SNPS do not keep changing but that is not saying no new SNPs occur. You are either incredibly stupid to think so or you are outright lying like your apologetic guru. If you were not so fucking brain dead you could go on to learn that an SNP is nothing more than a single nucleotide polymorphism which is usually cytosine replacing thymine (about a frequency of 67%). Many SNPs have no effect on cell function (these are the ones you and other creotards are ignoring), but scientists believe others could predispose people to disease or influence their response to certain drugs (these are the ones your tunnel vision is allowing you to see).(April 21, 2012 at 11:32 am)Phil Wrote:No I got my info from wiki and a .gov page.(April 21, 2012 at 11:26 am)Abishalom Wrote: First of all you never mentioned SNP (which I did not know what that was)Didn't have to. Anyone that knows evolutionary theory and genetics is well aware of what I was referring to. Just because your god prefers you to remain ignorant isn't my problem.Quote: But I did a little research... SNP apparently do not change often from 1 generation to the nextYeah, you did a little investagoogling apparently on AIG or some idiot creotard website. If you think there are no differences in SNPs from parent to offspring, you are beyond rationality and deserve nothing besides derision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-nucl...lymorphism
"Although more than 99% of human DNA sequences are the same, variations in DNA sequence can have a major impact on how humans respond to disease; environmental factors such as bacteria, viruses, toxins, and chemicals; and drugs and other therapies. This makes SNPs valuable for biomedical research and for developing pharmaceutical products or medical diagnostics. SNPs are also evolutionarily stable—not changing much from generation to generation—making them easier to follow in population studies."
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Hu...snps.shtml
Quote: Neutral in that it does not affect the function. But what if those neutral mutations receive a mutations? (hint they will become harmful).
Who is letting there imagination run wild asshole?
BTW, when it comes to evolution or mostly any topic on science
![[Image: 0iqvtg4qyua8j6uu906xg2.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img138.imageshack.us%2Fimg138%2F5210%2F0iqvtg4qyua8j6uu906xg2.jpg)