This is a very wierd sort of logic. As far as I can make out you are arguing that because there are things that defy human understanding it therefore follows that there must be a higher power.
But how can you come to this conclusion if the understanding and the ability to deduce a higher power is beyond our understanding?
But how can you come to this conclusion if the understanding and the ability to deduce a higher power is beyond our understanding?
![[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=oggtheclever.com%2Fcinjin_banner_border.jpg)
