RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
April 24, 2012 at 3:36 pm
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2012 at 3:47 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(April 24, 2012 at 3:31 pm)Scabby Joe Wrote: So the fact that a practice has the weight of tradition on its side and a prominent place in a given culture is morally irrelevant.
Morality is itself irrelevent when the main impact on people are those which the people involved accept. Chicken are not people. Humans are people.
However, human like animals such as Scrubby joe who seek to elevate chicken to the level of people can not be said to be either people or chicken. They can not think pragmatically like people, and they are useless for eating. So they are chickenshit.