If that is all that is 'valid' Kyu then that doesn't cover the problem in question. EV did mention at one point that to him, personal logical reasoning was evidence enough. I want to see if that's still the case. What he seems to link that to now is verifiable evidence - a circular argument.
For you to explain 'time', for example, you have to assume time is physically existent - a marginalist (ie unbelievably stupid) presumption.
For you to explain 'time', for example, you have to assume time is physically existent - a marginalist (ie unbelievably stupid) presumption.