Fr0d0 - Time exists as an abstract concept indeed...and guess what fr0d0? There's no evidence that it exists in any other way than an abstract concept. So PR is wrong if he asserts it exists...just as he is wrong to think consciousness is non-physcial just because it can't be physically detected - in the end it turned out that he was just defining non-physical to just mean 'not shown to be physical' - which doesn't mean it's actually non-physical - and I accepted that definition. So it's just playing with words because there's no actual evidence for anything non-physical.
I will accept any valid evidence fr0d0. So long as it's valid...if you can prove science wrong and it's non-empirical, that's fine by me - as long as it's valid. You'd be pulling a miracle off from my viewpoint, but I believe for God to exist it would have to be a total miracle anyway, so go figure.
The 'God is a twat' thing was me making an analogy and pisstaking what you have said in the past, about because there's no evidence for God you therefore have to have faith in him. So I was pretending to believe that God is a twat and then saying since there's no evidence for that I have to have faith in that.
EvD
I will accept any valid evidence fr0d0. So long as it's valid...if you can prove science wrong and it's non-empirical, that's fine by me - as long as it's valid. You'd be pulling a miracle off from my viewpoint, but I believe for God to exist it would have to be a total miracle anyway, so go figure.
The 'God is a twat' thing was me making an analogy and pisstaking what you have said in the past, about because there's no evidence for God you therefore have to have faith in him. So I was pretending to believe that God is a twat and then saying since there's no evidence for that I have to have faith in that.
EvD
