God does not love you...

[Shell B]

Then why argue the nature of his love?

It seems to me if you can attest to the love of God, you most certainly believe you know something of God.

No, I do not attest to the love of god. I am contesting your biased interpretations of your own holy book. Nothing more, nothing less.

This is a good reference, one apparently you did not read in it's entirety.
For it does not support your position.

Actually it does. My position is merely that you are wrong in your assessment. As this source does not support your assessment, it upholds my position. You are redefining words to suit your needs.

No, this would be considered a commentary. Do you not understand the contrast between the authority of reference material, and the conjecture found in personal or even an official commentary?

Pity that you don't understand that literally everything you read is commentary. Whether it is based on facts or not is the crux of it.

again no. This is not reference material. It is just a definition that does not support your assertion.

A definition is reference material. Of course, given that you don't bother with them, I completely understand that you were not aware of it. Now, it does support my "assertion," which is that you are full of shit.

Do you not find it amusing a four year old's argument has the ability to deconstruct and dismiss all of your perfectly spelled out and grammatically correct responses?

I would find that amusing, if it were true. It isn't.

I have always found that when people like you run out of relevant material to argue, the conversation appeals to their education as an attempt to accomplish what their well worded but poorly supported argument could not.

I did not mention your education. I mentioned your competency. I would be remiss if I used education as a crutch, given that you have almost certainly obtained more of a formal education than I have.

As if somehow the legitimacy of the argument is tied to how you spell.

Oh, neglecting to read what I wrote? I was not questioning the legitimacy of your argument based on your ability to spell. My complaint was that you are elevating yourself enough that you feel comfortable looking upon those who argue with you with derision whilst hacking at your keyboard like a chimp on crack. That has nothing to do with your argument. It has everything to do with your undeserved attitude.

I have also found this to be true: Those who can do, Those who can't teach. Those who can't teach grade posts, rather than address the topic being discussed.

I did address the topic being discussed. I don't see how you could have missed it, as you responded to it.

Really, I have never understood why some people can't seem to follow what just fucking happened.