(August 27, 2009 at 1:28 pm)Meatball Wrote:(August 27, 2009 at 3:19 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Meatball is drawing a ridiculous strawman conclusion (Pippy never said that)|
V(August 25, 2009 at 2:55 pm)Meatball Wrote:A) Note the obvious implication in Pippy's post.(August 23, 2009 at 12:13 am)Pippy Wrote: Someone crashed three planes into two sky scrapers and the most heavily defended building in the west, killing over 3,000. Than they worked up the American people to bomb Afghanistan, a country they admitted had "no military targets". Then they went to Iraq, for reasons that have clearly become false.If you're seriously suggesting the government flew those planes into those buildings, you're a fucking idiot.
B) Note the conditional in my post.
C) Note the tinfoil hat on your head and go fuck youself, you fucking loon.
Your points are idiotic because...
A) The implications are about using spurious reasoning for a retaliatory attack
B) Your post exactly states that Pippy is suggesting something he is not
And EV gives you a rep for this ??? WTF!?!