You showed zero good evidence that there ever was a distinction that was not demotic or which resisted syncretism. You did nothing to argue other than an appeal to your own cult's ethos, and when you were directed to look at even the concordances you use, you went as flat as an old soda. Here, you are doing the same. The best thing I can say for you, is that you prove christians have no understanding of language, but love to pretend that language exists because of them.
Address anything you like. You never prove a point aside from your own inability to prove a point.
Address anything you like. You never prove a point aside from your own inability to prove a point.
Trying to update my sig ...
