Well your words prove the opposite don't they EV? The subtleties of language you just don't get even though they're there before your eyes are confirmation enough. This isn't 'bare assertion' but observation.
Here like on other threads you pick at semantics like they have some bearing on truth. The bare fact hits you between the eyes yet your focus remains on the words delivering the facts such is your denial.
Here like on other threads you pick at semantics like they have some bearing on truth. The bare fact hits you between the eyes yet your focus remains on the words delivering the facts such is your denial.
