RE: Help! Joseph of Arimathea.
May 19, 2012 at 1:03 am
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2012 at 1:06 am by Phil.)
(May 19, 2012 at 12:59 am)Polaris Wrote:(May 19, 2012 at 12:56 am)Minimalist Wrote: You are making a claim with no evidence, Polaris. That's what getting you in trouble.
Xtian apologists who make excuses for their books do not cut it here.
If I was a Christian apologist, I would say 40 CE instead of the more accurate and academic 70 CE.
If 70 CE is academic then I am sure you can provide the physical evidence of a manuscript from then, please do or just stop making your bullshit claim and don't be surprised when you are called on the carpet for it.
(May 19, 2012 at 12:59 am)Polaris Wrote: t: now the earliest piece of manuscript dates to they same 68 CE, but that is only a partial page of the gospel and partial is not nearly good enough to know what the actual text was in full.....you know because we can't be sure how much the text was changed....aka the earliest manuscripts don't have added sections we have in modern Bibles.
Wait a fucking second. Some Christian apologists claim that a 1 inch piece of papyrus with 9 letters that was found in Qumran is proof that there was a gospel written in 68 CE? Tell you what, those apologisst suffer from the same delusion you are.
