Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?

[downbeatplumb]

no but i'd rather support it as an argument, after all if someone argues for something with no reason it's not entirely so strong. Besides, we may also suppose that there is no evidence that disputes the existence of god so therefore god must exist, an argument tantamount to that which you advocate. Obviously I agree that the lack of credible evidence is the basis for atheism itself but I'd rather attempt to substantiate this view than dogmatically oppose a lack of evidence to which my own argument is subject. I don't believe in God but I could never justify dismissing it entirely as a possibility simply because there is no empirical evidence.

If there is no evidence for something, thats a pretty good reason not to believe it.

If some evidence for god does pop up I'll have a look at it and review my postion then, until that time.

There is no god.