RE: Space Propulsion
May 21, 2012 at 11:28 pm
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2012 at 11:45 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(May 18, 2012 at 11:27 pm)Polaris Wrote: I actually prefer the concept of the Ion-Drive over plasma propulsion and no, it's not really because of Star Wars...well maybe a little. I just feel it is more efficient and less risky...reducing mechanical failure is a must on especially long-term duration missions.
Ion Propulsion
Since plasma is nothing more than ions, isn't plasma propulsion same as ion drive?

(May 21, 2012 at 11:22 pm)SleepingDemon Wrote: Let's see, FTL drive, better STL technology, shielding technology, artificial gravity, field dampeners, better weapon technology in case aliens aren't warm and fuzzy, better/cheaper spacesuits.. We are a so far away from even the most probable science fiction tv show or movie that it's embarrassing.
Don't get me started on the infinitesimal probability of any technological alien we encounter being susceptible to our "better" weapon technology.
UNiverse is 13 billion years old. The chance of a random technological alien species happen to be within the stage of technological development where they vulnerable to weapon technology that is within 5000 years (three millionth of the age of universe) of stone hand axe is...............
