Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
May 23, 2012 at 8:37 am (This post was last modified: May 23, 2012 at 9:14 am by KichigaiNeko.)
(May 23, 2012 at 8:25 am)gringoperry Wrote: Anyway, back to the subject in hand. I would personally want some sort of celebration; if for nothing more than creating a memory. Nakedness sounds good, but just be careful closing the register after you've signed it, Zen. I've seen those books, and the image of a flat worm springs to mind.
Well gringo, feel privileged that we announced this move on AF.org.
We are YET to mention this to any family. And SHOULD there be ANY ceremony pics WILL be uploaded!!
I'm really not one for a fuss and neither is Zen.
(May 23, 2012 at 8:36 am)Tiberius Wrote:
(May 23, 2012 at 8:06 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: Take a glass of wine and a chill pill Tiberius...no one has an attitude here except you.
I'm not the one constantly capitalizing words like "RIGHT" and then questioning whether I'd looked into something. I asked a simple question. You responded with the attitude.
Quote:No you will not my dear young one. Love has a great DEAL to do with it (hence the seven years) but...legalities are to be observed...we are not at Utopia yet little one so just calm the fuck down kid,
I'm glad love has to do with it. Your posts beforehand simply didn't reflect that (notably you saying that you are marrying "for Legal Reasons" and also that you don't need a husband because you are not a cow...not entirely sure where that even came from. Also, on the issue of attitude again, I'm not a kid. Kindly don't refer to me as one.
Mosrhun Wrote:I don't think she's exploiting the government for benefits at all. Who says they're not in love? She stated her reasoning, only one of which had any inclination of benefits. You can't deny that marriage makes legal situations much more efficient.
Well it certainly looked like it to me. She states she is getting married for legal reasons, I ask what they were, and she lists a load of government benefits. I wouldn't have raised the question if she hadn't specifically stated "for Legal Reasons" in the topic header, and then listed a load of benefits when queried.
gringoperry Wrote:Agreed. Tiberius, you really made that sound like she is only in it for the benefits. Can you elaborate on how you arrived at your conclusion?
Elaborated above.
Of course, if I'm wrong and they are marrying for love, then I congratulate them and send them my best wishes. However, the fact that Kichi stated "for Legal Reasons" in the subject set my suspicions going, and when I asked her what legal reasons they were, all she listed were government benefits to married couples. She further stated that she has no need of a husband since she is not a cow or domestic animal. I'm not entirely sure what she meant by that, since a husband has no relation whatsoever to those things.
No Tiberius. You are the one with the "attitude", you are the one that launched into the "govt. benefits",and you are the one who took the wrong attitude to a simple fiscal manoeuvring.
Welcome to the real world little one.
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
![[Image: 128914950930959410.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F07%2F128914950930959410.jpg)
