RE: Same sex marriage
May 25, 2012 at 5:59 am
(This post was last modified: May 25, 2012 at 6:00 am by Ben Davis.)
(May 25, 2012 at 12:46 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: It's really irrelevant if gays are in consideration.
Please can you explain how it's irrelevant for people, irrespective of their sexuality, sexual behaviour or sexual identity, who love each other to be able to celebrate their commitment to each other in the manner they wish?
(May 25, 2012 at 12:46 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Segregation, so to speak, is not there because people want to be assholes, it's there because it needs to be there. There needs to be a clear line which seperates sexual deviancy from normal sexuality which has the ability to spawn other human beings, which is what marriage used to be all about.
Wrong. Absolutely the wrong way round. Segregation is there because people want to be assholes. There is no such thing as sexual deviancy for consenting people of sexual maturity. Marriage has respected this at various points in history. On that basis, why should marriage legislation exist at all?
Sum ergo sum
