(August 31, 2009 at 1:53 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: Fr0d0,
My guess would be that he expects you explain what you are talking about because this is a forum for discussion. You are being a douche by not explaining yourself point for point. From what I can tell, you have no point other than the special pleading defense of God i.e. there can be no evidence of God therefore asking for evidence is ridiculous. Am I right? What am I missing? Maybe you will answer me?
My two cents,
Rhizo
Ev is talking about explaining what Pippy said, and why that shows the error in Meatballs criticism of him, which even Meatball concedes, which I have already detailed fully. Ev continues to not understand, and I have said I can do no more to show him.
The evidence thing is a reoccurring thing between us. It is EvF's (actual) stated campaign to repeat his demand for evidence more than anyone else in the history of mankind. I have entertained and addressed this question in vary many ways, very many times, and EvF has come back with the same one liner, so much so that it bores me to the extent my eyes hurt when I start reading his posts and he starts off with the same words for the nth time. So this discussion between EvF and I is exhausted. EvF thinks that the repetition of the question proves he's right, so he carries on repeating it. That's all.
