Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 17, 2025, 1:47 pm

Poll: What's the best approach?
This poll is closed.
Absolutely free but with option to donate.
17.39%
4 17.39%
Free but with trial period for premium features.
26.09%
6 26.09%
Free but premium features disabled unless you purchase.
47.83%
11 47.83%
Shareware. 30 day trial
8.70%
2 8.70%
Other? Please specify.
0%
0 0%
Total 23 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Best approach?
#16
RE: Best approach?
(June 2, 2012 at 2:51 pm)Cinjin Wrote: Who cares if a lot of people are using something you created if you're not making any money?????

To quote Justin Timberlake (pretending to be Sean Parker)

"You don't even know what the thing is yet. How big it can get, how far it can go. This is no time to take your chips down. A million dollars isn't cool, you know what's cool? A billion dollars."

It might not make money straight away but it's money in the bank if it attracts a shit load of people to use it and make them come to depend on it.

Quote:I use the free software Irfanview all the time. I don't know who designed it and I don't give a shit. Notoriety only means something if people actually know who you are, and since most of the world doesn't give a shit about programmers - go for the money. I'd rather make $50,000 from 2000 customers than $0 from 5,000,000 customers ....... customers who couldn't give a shit about who I am or what I've done.

I don't really think people care about Mark Zuckerberg. He ain't rich because of his own popularity, he is rich because of his creation.

I think the same can be said for Hypercube. If it's a great product and something people will use all the time, then you want to maximise that potential. Making people pay from the offset is no way to maximise that.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Best approach? - by Darwinian - June 2, 2012 at 8:26 am
RE: Best approach? - by Napoléon - June 2, 2012 at 9:54 am
RE: Best approach? - by Reforged - June 2, 2012 at 10:01 am
RE: Best approach? - by Darwinian - June 2, 2012 at 10:05 am
RE: Best approach? - by Reforged - June 2, 2012 at 10:16 am
RE: Best approach? - by Darwinian - June 2, 2012 at 10:32 am
RE: Best approach? - by Napoléon - June 2, 2012 at 10:38 am
RE: Best approach? - by Reforged - June 2, 2012 at 10:43 am
RE: Best approach? - by downbeatplumb - June 2, 2012 at 1:53 pm
RE: Best approach? - by jackman - June 2, 2012 at 11:23 am
RE: Best approach? - by Tiberius - June 2, 2012 at 11:55 am
RE: Best approach? - by Reforged - June 2, 2012 at 12:02 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Autumnlicious - June 2, 2012 at 1:48 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Autumnlicious - June 2, 2012 at 1:59 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Cinjin - June 2, 2012 at 2:51 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Napoléon - June 2, 2012 at 3:09 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Cinjin - June 2, 2012 at 3:27 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Napoléon - June 2, 2012 at 3:33 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Autumnlicious - June 2, 2012 at 4:14 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Napoléon - June 3, 2012 at 7:24 am
RE: Best approach? - by Cinjin - June 3, 2012 at 2:05 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Napoléon - June 3, 2012 at 5:07 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Annik - June 3, 2012 at 11:59 am
RE: Best approach? - by Darwinian - June 3, 2012 at 12:04 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Tiberius - June 3, 2012 at 2:20 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Autumnlicious - June 3, 2012 at 4:03 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Darwinian - June 3, 2012 at 4:13 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Autumnlicious - June 3, 2012 at 5:29 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Darwinian - June 3, 2012 at 7:03 pm
RE: Best approach? - by Autumnlicious - June 3, 2012 at 10:28 pm



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)