Darwinists claim that humans have evolved from chimpanzees in a period of abut 4 million years through the process of benificial mutations of the DNA sequence... This is "confirmed" by carbon dating and the fact that humans are 98% chimpanzee biologically.
Well the problem with this is that the human genome contains some three billion base pairs, making the 2 percent bringe gap between humans and chimpanzees sixty million pairs... That is the exact number of base pairs that would have to be benificially mutated, in precisely the right order, during a period of just 4 million years. Now the possibility of so many benificial mutations taking place during such a relatively small perod of time is lessend even more due to the fact that not a single benificial mutation has been achieved in a laboratory. Indeed, evolutionists have tried to recreate the process of evolution by attempting to mutate fruit-flies... But so far, despite them trying for over years now, not a single benificial mutation has been recorded, making a possibility that benificial mutatons are not possible all the more likely. So-called "reverse" mutations have indeed taken place in labs, but they do not prove that the mutated specimen has in fact preceeded the original. The only results for attempts at benificial mutations are a normal, unchanged specimen, a deformed and retarded specimen (quite an opposite to a "benificial mutation"), or a dead specimen.
So how could such a colossal number of toally random and unprovoked benificial mutations have taken place when evolutionists have so far proved that monitored and planned benificial mutations are not possible?
Well the problem with this is that the human genome contains some three billion base pairs, making the 2 percent bringe gap between humans and chimpanzees sixty million pairs... That is the exact number of base pairs that would have to be benificially mutated, in precisely the right order, during a period of just 4 million years. Now the possibility of so many benificial mutations taking place during such a relatively small perod of time is lessend even more due to the fact that not a single benificial mutation has been achieved in a laboratory. Indeed, evolutionists have tried to recreate the process of evolution by attempting to mutate fruit-flies... But so far, despite them trying for over years now, not a single benificial mutation has been recorded, making a possibility that benificial mutatons are not possible all the more likely. So-called "reverse" mutations have indeed taken place in labs, but they do not prove that the mutated specimen has in fact preceeded the original. The only results for attempts at benificial mutations are a normal, unchanged specimen, a deformed and retarded specimen (quite an opposite to a "benificial mutation"), or a dead specimen.
So how could such a colossal number of toally random and unprovoked benificial mutations have taken place when evolutionists have so far proved that monitored and planned benificial mutations are not possible?
Atheism: The beleif that there was nothing and then nothing magically exploded for no reason, creating everything..... Makes perfect sense. :confused2:
