No I never said that I write all of your arguments off. I am thinking about them, I simply question their credibility... Not that I'm ignoring them completely...
And actually a bit more than what Adrian says beleive in creation... I dont know where you got your figures from mate. And are you not doing the same by ignoring the creationist arguments and evidences? I mean I'm a rookie at this, and am mainly doing this for the sake of the dabate, but other scientists have proved darwinists wrong and blown them outta the water.
And theres no need to patronise me darwinian, just cos im 16 dosent mean I'm stupid. I mean, you might be looking at your own children and thinking I got the same level of intelligence, but no, you're wrong...
Now then, fair enough lets presume that benificial mutations indeed DID occur... So that means that out of a 100,000,000 of them Hominids, or whatever you guys claim that we have evolved from, only 1 would have a benificial mutation. Provided that that one is not killed by any other factor, (ie, eaten by a predator, die by accident etc. the possibilites of that would be enormous in the primeval world)before it reproduces, the genetic line of that mutant must be contued until the numbers of the species with the same mutation have reached 100,000,000. Now theother must have been dying off by now, even though their numbers would be 100,000,000x100,000,000 approx. (I cant be bothered to write all the zeros again sorry). So then that lot dies off. And in the 100,000,000 of the benificial mutants ANOTHER benificial mutation must take place.... Provided that that one is not killed by any other factor, (ie, eaten by a predator, die by accident etc. the possibilites of that would be enormous in the primeval world) etc.etc. The process must be repeated millions of times until the homo sapiens would have been achieved. And each benificial mutant must survive until it reproduces etc. The odds are totally agains the whole thing. Guys, are you serious by saying that all this fitted into 4 million years?
And actually a bit more than what Adrian says beleive in creation... I dont know where you got your figures from mate. And are you not doing the same by ignoring the creationist arguments and evidences? I mean I'm a rookie at this, and am mainly doing this for the sake of the dabate, but other scientists have proved darwinists wrong and blown them outta the water.
And theres no need to patronise me darwinian, just cos im 16 dosent mean I'm stupid. I mean, you might be looking at your own children and thinking I got the same level of intelligence, but no, you're wrong...
Now then, fair enough lets presume that benificial mutations indeed DID occur... So that means that out of a 100,000,000 of them Hominids, or whatever you guys claim that we have evolved from, only 1 would have a benificial mutation. Provided that that one is not killed by any other factor, (ie, eaten by a predator, die by accident etc. the possibilites of that would be enormous in the primeval world)before it reproduces, the genetic line of that mutant must be contued until the numbers of the species with the same mutation have reached 100,000,000. Now theother must have been dying off by now, even though their numbers would be 100,000,000x100,000,000 approx. (I cant be bothered to write all the zeros again sorry). So then that lot dies off. And in the 100,000,000 of the benificial mutants ANOTHER benificial mutation must take place.... Provided that that one is not killed by any other factor, (ie, eaten by a predator, die by accident etc. the possibilites of that would be enormous in the primeval world) etc.etc. The process must be repeated millions of times until the homo sapiens would have been achieved. And each benificial mutant must survive until it reproduces etc. The odds are totally agains the whole thing. Guys, are you serious by saying that all this fitted into 4 million years?
Atheism: The beleif that there was nothing and then nothing magically exploded for no reason, creating everything..... Makes perfect sense. :confused2:
