(September 2, 2009 at 2:37 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The TAG was subsidiary to JP's point. He stated all along that the TAG was a logical conclusion given the premise, and worked for other premises. I don't know where you get the idea he was claiming anything from that.
Of course you cry evidence, that marginalist, baseless, philosophical assertion. Logic is the seed, and unrefuted it will grow inside you unchecked because you cannot refute it, and you'll implode. (well not the last bit)
Fr0d0, please take your bum-fuckery of Jon Paul away from my thread
Here's one:
"I don't have to "prove" anything.
You see, I have this wonderful thing called "faith" and with that I have no need of proof. "
