(September 2, 2009 at 2:37 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The TAG was subsidiary to JP's point. He stated all along that the TAG was a logical conclusion given the premise, and worked for other premises. I don't know where you get the idea he was claiming anything from that.The premise was that knowledge, morality, and logic all exist. I accept that.
The premise also stated that these things are transcendent. I don't accept that (there is no evidence for it).
The conclusion was that the Christian God existed. That I don't accept at all because it is a massive jump from what the premise is, and there are plenty of other explanations for the existence of knowledge, morality, logic, etc.
