RE: first discovered?
June 8, 2012 at 4:53 pm
(This post was last modified: June 8, 2012 at 4:53 pm by Cyberman.)
I wouldn't put much faith in Zakir Naik if I were you. Nothing of what he says is true, nor even based on truth. He was banned from entering the UK in 2010 for his "unacceptable behaviour". RationalWiki has this, dismissively short, article about him: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zakir_Naik
In case anyone accuses me of posting only biased sources, here's another and much more comprehensive smackdown from a very religious organisation, who describe Naik as "a remarkable memory drive but has sloppy logic, a penchant for half-truths, and dangerously extremist views":
http://www.unchangingword.com/naik_refuted.php
In case anyone accuses me of posting only biased sources, here's another and much more comprehensive smackdown from a very religious organisation, who describe Naik as "a remarkable memory drive but has sloppy logic, a penchant for half-truths, and dangerously extremist views":
http://www.unchangingword.com/naik_refuted.php
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
