RE: Euthyphro dilemma asked for evolution.
June 9, 2012 at 7:24 pm
(This post was last modified: June 9, 2012 at 7:27 pm by Mystic.)
(June 9, 2012 at 7:19 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I stated that it's likely to be wrong -in so far as the set of people who agree with me- are concerned. That assumes that people agree with me, not that any part of this statement (or morality) is objective. Try again.
When you say people agree with you, you imply you are of the opinion it is likely to be wrong and others agree with you, are you not?
(June 9, 2012 at 7:19 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Unfortunately, no. Even if there were universal agreement that such an act was morally wrong, you'd still be left with the task of demonstrating that it was so independent of opinion.
Well I disagree that objective morality is such that it is right irrespective of all opinions. I think it needs one opinion that is correct. If all humans are wrong, there is still opinion of God which is correct. Without one opinion that is correct, you would not have objective morality either.
