RE: Prolonging lifespans
June 13, 2012 at 4:10 pm
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2012 at 4:38 pm by Ace Otana.)
(June 13, 2012 at 3:42 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You first Ace. There really isn't anything gentle or kind about population control either way you approach it. It's shit sandwich on the one hand, a shit pie on the other (imo).
Already done my bit. I'm not having kids.
The gentler way means limiting how many kids you have, the cruel way is death by starvation. Fewer kids or more deaths?
It's not actually about telling people how many kids they can have or trying to force anyone to do or not do anything, it's merely a warning of what will happen should we continue. Ultimately, it's entirely up to us how the future unfolds. Whether it be good or disastrous.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
