1. So you were 'mildly stoned' and you consider it somewhat evidence? Ergo why it's a belief at all, despite the fact it's not that strong? Cos I don't see how that's evidence see...
2. Yeah, so there's evidence for this one. The first one you consider there to be weak evidence? But I don't see how this 'weak evidence' is valid at all if that's the case...so in other words, how is it evidence at all? How does it back up the belief whatsoever, logically?
There I 'took them'.
P.S: I'm just wondering if this is semi-on topic, properly on topic, or off-topic.
EvF
2. Yeah, so there's evidence for this one. The first one you consider there to be weak evidence? But I don't see how this 'weak evidence' is valid at all if that's the case...so in other words, how is it evidence at all? How does it back up the belief whatsoever, logically?
There I 'took them'.
P.S: I'm just wondering if this is semi-on topic, properly on topic, or off-topic.
EvF
