Antinatalism

[goddamnit]

Does the fact that a bad outcome has a low probability negate the principle of taking a risk that weighs heavily on someone else? For example, suppose you built a gigantic revolver/gun that holds 100 bullets in the thing that spins. (I don't know much about gun parts, so forgive the terminology.) Similar to Russia roulette, you put a single bullet in and there is only a 1% chance it will shoot the bullet after spinning the circular part of the revolver. Now, in this example, you aim the gun at someone else's leg (who did not agree to it) and pull the trigger. If the person does not get shot, you give them $1,000. If it shoots them, you rush them to the hospital. The likelihood of another individual suffering is small, but it does not make it right to take a risk where someone else suffers if it goes wrong.