"Which part of that is a conspiracy theory?
Who in their right mind would pick Romney? Or McCain? Theres not *that* many retards out there. You're left with one candidate, just one.
How easy would it be to open up elections to more candidates? Instead of choosing between two or three you'd choose between six. Thats a choice.
Then you're never left with having to choose based purely on who you thinks less of a dick. Odds are there would be at least one who actually has the interests of the country at heart instead of honoring the numerous deals and handshakes they made to get where they are.
Doesn't happen, why not?"
You seem to be suggesting that it is carefully engineered whom we must choose due to the scarcity of available choices. I suggest that the choice between two may not be the choice between six, but it IS a choice-or the choice between six is NOT.
Who in their right mind would pick Romney? Or McCain? Theres not *that* many retards out there. You're left with one candidate, just one.
How easy would it be to open up elections to more candidates? Instead of choosing between two or three you'd choose between six. Thats a choice.
Then you're never left with having to choose based purely on who you thinks less of a dick. Odds are there would be at least one who actually has the interests of the country at heart instead of honoring the numerous deals and handshakes they made to get where they are.
Doesn't happen, why not?"
You seem to be suggesting that it is carefully engineered whom we must choose due to the scarcity of available choices. I suggest that the choice between two may not be the choice between six, but it IS a choice-or the choice between six is NOT.
Trying to update my sig ...
