RE: Questions for American Atheists
July 2, 2012 at 11:58 am
(This post was last modified: July 2, 2012 at 12:05 pm by Reforged.)
(July 2, 2012 at 10:39 am)Epimethean Wrote: "Which part of that is a conspiracy theory?
Who in their right mind would pick Romney? Or McCain? Theres not *that* many retards out there. You're left with one candidate, just one.
How easy would it be to open up elections to more candidates? Instead of choosing between two or three you'd choose between six. Thats a choice.
Then you're never left with having to choose based purely on who you thinks less of a dick. Odds are there would be at least one who actually has the interests of the country at heart instead of honoring the numerous deals and handshakes they made to get where they are.
Doesn't happen, why not?"
You seem to be suggesting that it is carefully engineered whom we must choose due to the scarcity of available choices. I suggest that the choice between two may not be the choice between six, but it IS a choice-or the choice between six is NOT.
I suggest no such thing and claim to have no such knowledge. It might be or it could be that it simply is, it makes little difference. There isn't a single thing I've typed here that isn't true and you still have not answered my question.
Why only two or if your lucky three? Why such limited choice? When the solution to a nation having to pick between the lesser of two evils is as simple as increasing the number of candidates why isn't it implemented?
I don't have the answer, if you don't either would you kindly just say so?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
