A good case against God

[Tempus]

I would agree. So.....?

[Darwin and Einstein] both believed in God. Again it suggests that God is not the same as these fables.

No, they didn't. And this has been pointed out to you several times, both by myself and others. Here's my post on the subject from page 5 of this thread:

---

and this has included such brilliant minds as Charles Darwin (a deist), Aristotle, William of Occham, Einstein, etc

Appeal to authority. Also, you're conflating a lot of different beliefs / equivocating... Darwin's beliefs changed over the course of his life from Christian, to a sort of deist, then to what he called "agnostic". Einstein, to my understanding, was never a theist or a deist. He believed in Spinoza's god, which has nothing to do with some intelligent deity beginning the universe.

1. Darwin and Einstein would not seriously believe a children's fable is true
2. Darwin and Einstein seriously believed God existed
3. Therefore God is not a children's fable

Please don't interpret this as me being rude, but you have an abysmal understanding of how logic works. Firstly, the conclusion doesn't follow the premises, making it a non-sequitur; you'd need to add an additional premise, something like "Darwin and Einstein can't be wrong", for example. Darwin and Einstein could simply be mistaken; after all, they've both been wrong before. Secondly, the premises themselves aren't known to be true - how do we know #1? And #2, as I highlighted above, is flat-out wrong. Thirdly, the whole argument is an appeal to authority. The argument is both invalid and unsound.

---

Everyone makes mistakes and that's understandable. On this matter, however, you persist in repeating the same mistake, seemingly impervious to any facts or contradictions that come your way. Please don't state the same demonstrably incorrect thing again.