(September 5, 2009 at 2:03 pm)Arcanus Wrote:(September 5, 2009 at 1:55 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: So that the TAG argument has been repeatedly pointed out to have flaws, and that the claimed fallacies in those arguments are largely of your own imagining, isn't sufficient?
My imagination does not determine what is and isn't a fallacy. Logic does. If I identify a fallacy and explain how it was committed, and you disagree with my assessment, feel free to do so—but on logical grounds, if you please. I will respond to your critiques, by either refuting it or conceding to it—on logical grounds
And in my experience all you theists do EXACTLY that ... the fallacies in opposing arguments that you see are in your heads and ARE NOT based on logic.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
