This is a type of game that I thought of.
First, I'll write something in this post which may or may not be true. Then, the next poster will either say "science" or "pseudoscience" in response to the above.
Then, in the second line, he or she will write another sentence which may or may not be true, and the next poster will have to either say "science" or "pseudoscience" to the post above (or they can also say "neither" or "unknown" depending on their opinions), and then they will write their own sentence for others to say whether or not they are scientifically true.
Here is the first one to start it off:
A master of qi (or chi), by creating and focusing a lot of chi energy around his hands, can cause enough heat to put a newspaper on fire.
First, I'll write something in this post which may or may not be true. Then, the next poster will either say "science" or "pseudoscience" in response to the above.
Then, in the second line, he or she will write another sentence which may or may not be true, and the next poster will have to either say "science" or "pseudoscience" to the post above (or they can also say "neither" or "unknown" depending on their opinions), and then they will write their own sentence for others to say whether or not they are scientifically true.
* * *
Here is the first one to start it off:
A master of qi (or chi), by creating and focusing a lot of chi energy around his hands, can cause enough heat to put a newspaper on fire.
