(July 13, 2012 at 2:48 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(July 13, 2012 at 2:17 pm)Chuck Wrote: your assumption is impossible to take seriously.
Are you sure? At the very least, it seems like objective greatness exists. That is our intuition. Even if you are not sure, can you positively say it can't be taken seriously. This specially if you are agnostic, for all you know, God exists, hence objective greatness does exist. And if he does exist, why can't we have been given knowledge that objective greatness or objective morality does exist.
I respect remaining agnostic if you don't know, but, I don't understand the premise not being taken seriously.
Yes, I am sure. I see nothing objective in the statement "objective greatness exists". What is meant by greatness? What is meant by existing? If I conceives of a concept call "WAAA", does WAAA therefore objectively exist? In what sense? If I conceive of a concept called "There is no objective greatness", does that mean "There is no objective greatness" therefore now also exists along side of "Objective greatness exists"?
