(September 6, 2009 at 5:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(September 6, 2009 at 4:18 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: It is YOUR hypothesis, it is therefore YOUR responsibility to produce both evidence to support and to define what would falsify it ... it is not now and never has been mine!It precisely ISN'T my philosophy. I've said many times that evidence is not possible. It is you that has said you will believe given evidence.
Yet here you are unable to produce one example of what would constitute evidence.
I call FAIL
You can call fail all you like but the simple fact is that your non-evidence requiring god requires exactly the same amount of evidence as nothign and offers precisely the same value in any objective terms so FAIL YOURSELF!
(September 6, 2009 at 5:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Wrong. I too believe that universe is coherent, rational, guided by a consistent and inherently explainable set of rules.
My hypothesis explains everything it needs to explain. Possibly even science, but then ever doesn't compete with scientific research. Inherently it requires no evidential support, thought this isn't anything internally problematic. It offers value in that it's a roadmap to a fulfilled life for those who prefer a guide rather than relying on chance and a lot of pain. And finally, it can very easily be distinguished from everything else.
Yet you don't because the god you believe in is inherently inexplicable and therefore shows you're just as disingenuous as always.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
