(September 7, 2009 at 8:02 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: What kindness?
Kyu Wrote:(and calling it that is being kind)
(September 7, 2009 at 8:02 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Fair enough but the ONLY reason your god is beyond that is BECAUSE YOU DEFINE IT TO BE SOQuote:Not me... usYou either:
[quote='Kyuuketsuki' pid='31146' dateline='1252324923'] ... what I dispute is the validity of the DEFINITION!! I simply DO NOT and NEVER WILL accept that a god of any kind can act upon this universe WITHOUT LEAVING A TRAIL OF EVIDENCE!
1. limit God's omnipotence by ruling that he's not powerful enough to hide his tracks.
2. limit your understanding of what would constitute an act of God
[quote='Kyuuketsuki' pid='31146' dateline='1252324923']Here's the answer you're looking for:
I have no idea actually testifies to the fact that I do not accept it can happen without evidence and NOT to the way you twist it to mean.
Which amounts to: you can't provide one example of what would constitute evidence for God.
Therefore: To be honest you should refrain from saying that God hasn't shown up because given your own reasoning this is impossible to prove.
