The Rules

[Kyuuketsuki]

This has been covered to death on these forum recently Kyu.

Describing something that is identical to (the Christian) God is just another way of labeling something we already have a label for.

Describing something dissimilar to (the Christian) God is not (the Christian) God.

And yet another dodge from the master?

You know I don't believe that you have actually answered this particular question anywhere on this forum and that VOID (the first that I saw to come up with it) continues to hammer at you with variants of it strongly suggests I am right.

So let me ask you it again further boosting VOID’s efforts … if you have two ideas (a god and a nothing) both claimed to require the same level of evidence how do you tell them apart?

I mean this is a simple enough question and it seems to me you have four choices:
1. You can answer it and kudos to you if you do if you actually answer it and persuade us that it is possible to tell the difference.
2. You can link to wherever it is you claim/imply you answered it before (again kudos as before if it actually answers the question).
3. You can admit you don’t have a method at all (yet again kudos for honesty) or …
4. You can dodge again (because that’s what I think and VOID appears to think you are doing with respect to this question).

Not trying to be funny but that IS what you appear to be doing so please answer the question.

Kyu