RE: The Stage is Yours.
July 27, 2012 at 10:29 pm
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2012 at 10:46 pm by Reforged.)
(July 27, 2012 at 8:58 pm)ElDinero Wrote:(July 27, 2012 at 7:19 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Oh it's "scanned" now. so poor Eld here is basing his precise accusation on a rough glance you took? Nice.
I have no interest in being evasive. If you have a question, ask, and I'm pretty much guaranteed to answer, such is my disposition.
It's a deplorable fallacy that you guys use this "running away" bullshit, when you yourselves fail to address most questions.
How fucking dare you, you little cunt. How dare you even suggest that I haven't asked a direct question? How dare you imply that I've been somehow unclear in what I'm requesting, or that you've ever asked me a question that I have declined to answer? Is that seriously what you're saying? If that's what you're saying I've done, I'm going to embarrass you, in a severe way. Find a time I've ever failed to address a question of yours. This isn't a rhetorical challenge, go and do it.
You're a little fuckface, as you know, who evades questions constantly and will never give a straight answer. But despite your slippery manner, I won't have you accuse me of being indirect in my questioning, which for a year now has been most blunt.
You know exactly what you're doing, you take joy in it, you love gaining this kind of reaction from people and whether or not you believe in the God you claim to worship, you're a twat. Answer the question, you cunt, or shut up and fuck off. I'm going to start reporting your posts, every single time I see you being evasive or vague, in the hope that you get banned for constant derailing of threads, which is all you do.
Feel like I've been indirect now, you little tosser?
Its fine Dinero, hes only shooting himself in the foot. People will read through this thread and they'll make their own minds up. I'm unsure if theres a rule against it but its definitely not remotely close to what the rules of a debate are. Responding with insults and deflections is nothing less than a shameless mockery that should be exposed for what it is when it is attempted.
I'm of the opinion that if someone lets anyone doing this get away with it, it validates it. The alternative is to repeat the question clearly and plainly demonstrate why his answer is a clear deflection and state he has a choice. Answer, retreat or continue to insult the intelligence of the readers with further deflection. If he attempts another insulting deflection then repeat until he gives a direct answer or he retreats. Don't let up, patience is a virtue. If he retreats then at least you get a neat little trophy for your signature.
In one thread Fr0d0 actually responded with an answer when I presented this proposition repeatedly after de-constructing each individual deflection which presents the potential for further debate as opposed to running around in circles. This is in stark contrast to the previous two threads this was used in where he eventually went into a full retreat veiled by insults. I'd like to take this as a sign of progress in that he is maturing and learning that insults and deflection aren't a legitimate means by which to debate with but I remain a realist and realize that it will probably take a few more years of this before he comes to terms with this simple fact.
Thats ok though, I am a very patient man.
By the way, have you seen my signature? :-)
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.