Oh, and as long as I'm here at the moment, I'll address one more point. You make reference at the end of your post about me basing my conclusions on some basic assumption and such, basically accusing me of the fallacy of the stolen concept. However, since I am not the one making positive claims here, I can borrow them all the doo dah day long and not incur a fallacy so long as I demonstrate that using assumptions common to us both results in an absurdity when combined properly with your claim. This is simply applied reductio ad absurdum, and your complaint of duplicity is thereby groundless and irrelevant.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)