RE: Dialetheism
July 31, 2012 at 3:32 pm
(This post was last modified: July 31, 2012 at 3:35 pm by Categories+Sheaves.)
Reminds me of a scene in Youth Without Youth (Coppola + Eliade) where the protagonist talks to his girlfriend about how there are actually four truth-states a statement can have: it can be true, it can be false, it can be simultaneously true and false, or it can be neither true nor false.
...and then they pursue the issue no further. I wanted to see some nontrivial use of paraconsistent logic. but no dice.
Linky to the nontrivial systems?
...and then they pursue the issue no further. I wanted to see some nontrivial use of paraconsistent logic. but no dice.
(July 31, 2012 at 1:54 am)CliveStaples Wrote: ...kinda-sorta-not-really...I did cringe, but it's also nice to know I'm not the only one here who likes ring theory.
But there are non-trivial systems which implement dialetheism. So I guess you could think of these as non-integral domains, if you want to keep abusing mathematical terminology.
Linky to the nontrivial systems?
