Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 9, 2025, 2:44 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Need a proof (real analysis)
#2
RE: Need a proof (real analysis)
You can do the first conjecture in one line by multiplying both sides by (1/3)g, yielding
(a/3)g + (b/3)g +(1/3)g >= (a/3 + b/3 + 1/3)g
Which is true by the concavity of f(x) = xg for g in [0,1]

#2 is simple if you interpret each side as an integral of xg's derivative (which is monotonically decreasing, etc.).

Anyway, that's the easy route. Since you've specified that this is a simple real analysis question, were you looking for a purely algebraic argument? (because it feels like there should be one...)
Thinking

afterthought: you meant "let a,b be integers", right?
So these philosophers were all like, "That Kant apply universally!" And then these mathematicians were all like, "Oh yes it Kan!"
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Need a proof (real analysis) - by CliveStaples - July 31, 2012 at 5:35 pm
RE: Need a proof (real analysis) - by Categories+Sheaves - July 31, 2012 at 6:18 pm
RE: Need a proof (real analysis) - by CliveStaples - July 31, 2012 at 6:26 pm
RE: Need a proof (real analysis) - by CliveStaples - July 31, 2012 at 6:54 pm
RE: Need a proof (real analysis) - by CliveStaples - July 31, 2012 at 7:30 pm
RE: Need a proof (real analysis) - by CliveStaples - August 2, 2012 at 10:11 pm



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)