(July 31, 2012 at 7:18 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote:Nope(July 31, 2012 at 6:24 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: Hmmm.
So it is a fixation.
Sorry? Did you just imply that asking whether you believe hermaphrodites to be abominations is the same as asking you if you believe overweight ladies to be abominations?
Now, watch carefully what comes next....
(July 31, 2012 at 7:18 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: I think both minorities would be rather offended by that comparison.
You mean the comparison YOU made?
(July 31, 2012 at 7:18 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: The idea that you think a severe genetic defect comparable to a weight condition is quite horrendous.
No - the idea that YOU think that is horrendous.
The idea that YOU want to project that thinking onto others is worse.
(July 31, 2012 at 7:18 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: I sincerely hope we are not to take this as the typical view held by your religion.
It's not. And I dont.
(July 31, 2012 at 7:18 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: I wonder what W.L. Craig would say about this rather ugly insinuation hastily made to dodge a simple question.
What ugly insinuation? The one YOU keep hammering on with?
Mr Craig is probably used to atheists making ugly insinuations about what Christians really mean
I threw up in my mouth when you said you - quote - ''sincerely hope'' - unquote - that I wasnt going to be baited into a discussion...about rough anal sex, prolapsed rectums, ''fat chicks'', hermaphrodites...(how long is your list?)
I'm not being evasive. I already told you, pages ago, I am not going to answer those (type of) questions.